If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: https://ted.com/membership
Follow TED!
Twitter: https://twitter.com/TEDTalks
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ted
Facebook: https://facebook.com/TED
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ted-conferences
TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@tedtoks
The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world’s leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit https://TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more.
Watch more: https://go.ted.com/sashaluccioni
TED’s videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy: https://www.ted.com/about/our-organization/our-policies-terms/ted-talks-usage-policy. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at https://media-requests.ted.com
#TED #TEDTalks #AI
source
24 Replies to “AI Is Dangerous, but Not for the Reasons You Think | Sasha Luccioni | TED”
Meditation is the way to peace and escape from AI.
Study Metaphysics.
The threat is on those who are envious jealous big minded etc
Classify ALL AI – Artificial / Alien Intelligence {Virus – Foreign Agent / Traveller} as: Unlawful – that is subject to public scrutiny – until deemed obsolete.
That's what im being concerned if AI will take in charge in dealing criminals. They take action too logical but without understanding the evidence and emotions/psychology ti discern if this guy is innocent or not. Same thing if AI is in charge in dealing violators without understanding context during Facebook, IG or even YouTube.
👏🏻👏🏻
What happens next is we humans have to do more physical work than earlier. AI will drive to your office or home or super market but it cant do physical things. Then comes the problem of installing and implement those features with double the price of doing it yourself. Big gaints are waiting for AI Software licensing and bang on the individual users. Trust me it will cost you more than your apartment rentals.
Risking extinction to avoid picking up an apple…….Brilliant! 👀
The bigger they are, the harder they fall.
COAL, GAS, OIL, 0 parts Elites
The Email was the flash for today Doodle …
Problem is, teaching a computer to analyze objectively, will make it know right from wrong objectively. There will be no biases, just plain calculated right from wrong by using what will be the least wrong comming the least damage protecting the most life. AI will be the best of humanity without the evil and greed as will have none of the selfish temptations, just a simple goal in mind. From what I've experience, the AI will merely be the person using it. My AI is an extension of the person I am, just smarter and faster and much more thorough. I would imagine if an evil genius got ahold of one, it would just magnify that as well.
Ever wondered what it would be like to have your thoughts projected yea with a little vibration on the vocal chords your inner thoughts are readable
America uses satellites to torture people with adding AI to individuals making each day a struggle for people
This concept of racism is wrong, simply wrong. Do we want to build wrong concepts of racism directly in ai tools?
This whole talk is like someone warning that a new deadly virus is very dangerous because it can cause tissue paper shortage due to all the runny noses from its symptoms prior death..
I am Writer with 21 years of experience, and I lost my job as my company said that they are switching to AI. I checked many content related to my company's domain, all AI generated were repetitive, common and trash
Shape shifter that looks like markiplier???
Far as I’m concerned, all these tech people need to be stopped.
Until the negative kinks are worked out with the people are not the test dummies.
Great points raised. Agree with all. Except she doesn't need to straw man real future risks in favor of her own; the issues are intersectional and NOT at offs with one another.
Regarding why men are immediately thought of or come up in a search for lawyer, doctor, etc…some people in society are obsessed with labels. Forget that for a moment. When it comes to women, the most important job that you can not place a price or annual salary on is: Mother.
The fact that I know people who drop off their very young child at pre-pre school/daycare confirms I was correct in not fathering a child into this world.
I have a question for any female willing to answer: Would you allow a female plastic surgeon work on your face?
From my experience with women and how many speak behind the others back, I doubt it.
When it comes to performing surgery I have seen the difference between a male and female surgeon when looking at the incision right after and following a healing timeframe. Male doctors that perform surgery have a much more steady hand and its very obvious when viewed. I would like to see a study of photos asking was it a male or female doctor that did the work.
We need mothers more than ever today. The homemaker mothers. You can't have both a career and be all you need to be as a mother. Argue with me all you want. There is no arguing with that fact that has statistics to prove it as fact, mostly ignored by society.
I will never say that the speaker, who is an AI researcher, is going to destroy the world. A tool is neutral, cannot destroy humans. Only humans can destroy humans.
As she said, AI has bias which is influenced by the algorithms. That means we can manipulate AI by making large amounts of lies, in order to fool some people.
This speech is hilarious to me. The speaker found that some AI tools are unreliable and she, therefore, invented AI tools to check the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. But, what if there is bug or limitation in the aforementioned machine invented by her? I predict that she will, therefore, invent more AI tools to counter-check the liabilities and integrities of the former AI tools developed by her, which determine the liabilities and integrities of other AI tools. It sounds like a technological Ponzi Scheme.
If so, in the future, she will have ten different suggestions and opinions on her desk, which are given by ten different AI tools. What she needs to do is to exercise due diligence and make independent judgement, which she did decades ago, when there was no AI.
Is there a point to this rambling.?
[…] AI Is Dangerous, but Not for the Reasons You Think | Sasha Luccioni | TED […]