
Support me on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/Sabine
In this video I will explain what the main differences are between the current approaches to artificial intelligence and human intelligence.
For this I first explain how neural networks work and in which sense they mimic the human brain.
I then go through the ten most relevant differences that are: Form and function, size, connectivity, power consumption, architecture, activation potential, speed, learning technique, structure, and precision.
Finally I express my opinion that the benefit of research in artificial intelligence is not the reproduce human-like intelligence, but instead to produce types of intelligence unlike our own that complement our own abilities.
source
20 Replies to “10 differences between artificial intelligence and human intelligence”
The corn difference between humane and AI is " consciousness". Human has consciousness but AI don't. Before Aden and Eve ate the "APPLE" in the Garden of Eden, they are basally only "AI" created by the GOD. But after they ate the APPLE, they became Humane being. That is the story of Human race.
The brain of a small insect is many times simpler than the human brain, and yet it can do things that AI cannot. Consider a fly, it has about 150,000 neurons and can quickly distinguish objects during flight and react appropriately to them. In addition, it can quickly operate its wings to make its flight as needed. Can AI do this? Couldn't the fly's brain also drive self-driving cars?
Saaabinaaa!!!!! You look Sabrina (tasty) in that outfit!!!!
Hello 👋🏾 I've been binge watching your videos tonight. I have a question. In the pursuit of building technology to help us with what we're bad at, wouldn't it be nice if those machines could also be companions? Why not filter the noise to interpret how to feel? I don't know much about stuff, but is AGI a buzz phrase or can we create something capable of being indiscernible from human intelligence? Thanks for making these videos. I just happened upon them.
She forgot the most important diff. The human brain is useless without hormones and other chemical signals to adjust the computation. Without these chemicals, the human brain on its own will make mistakes. Talking about hormones, I like Sabina's new looks, sexyyyyyyyy dressing
This is a science video. Why u gotta wear that?
I love you for your smarts, Dear Sabine. Keep well. Thanks for sharing.
Smart and Gorgeous! Wow!
AI can't admit when it's wrong so incapable to correct itself while human intelligence can and seek to correct itself.
Lovely, presentation.
So the AI is better. It is always correct but the humans make mistakes to learn.
AI not good at Chinese poker game"landlord" . even "Alpha-go" can't do if coding for it. Thank u for explaining why .
Brilliant!
Thank you.
dammmmmm
sexy woman
What a fine specimen. Beauty, grace, exceptional intelligence, be still my heart.😮
human neurons also have way more individual behaviour.. not only can the cell body give out signals, each dendrite ("hand of a neuron") can give them out as well, independently.
Well, I'm gonna downgrade the conversation. You look so sexy in this one.
Just a guy on the internet so assume in my Moms basement eating Dorritos BUT '8. . . . no one knows in detail how humans learn but we know thats not how they do it'? That appears to be exactly how humans learn minus the word-play, prediction–>expectation–>measure-deviation–>prediction error correction? We know this is so at least in motor-skill learning. What am I missing, sure we are not doing it in wet-ware but learning itself does not have any other means that I know of? Predict-test-correct-confirm?
Now we have Chat GPT 4 with trillions of parameters.
It is not clear now the comparison.