Eventually, you will make a Supertask!

this is literally the same as the pi = 4 "proof" 😢 tired of seeing it. just bc when you fold something up and it appears smaller doesn't mean it's actually smaller. it's just dense

no

Ha-of

2 half

swapping limiting factors

Ooh this is the exact same fallacy as the the problem where you can take the distance around a square and repeatedly add more and more 90° turns to make it look like a right triangle, but keep the same perimeter. Basically they never actually fundamentally change what shape they are, therefore they do not adobt the properties of the shape that they look like

I’m an engineer, yes it does

The limit of the sum of the sequen as dx approaches infinity of pi/N is the same as the series 1/N times pi. Making the correct answer 2Pi

Infinitely squiggly still

Well if we cut 2 into infinte number of x where x is radius of one circle we get x + x + x +…. = 2
So x times infinity is equal to 2 so x is infinitely close to 0. We get pi x + pi x + …. = pi from our first observance so infinity times pi times x = pi so x times infinity equals one which would contradict our previous findings. Even if those two infinites arent the same (bcs yes they arent all the same) then even simple logic is sufficient. Going infinitely close to 0 with radius doesnt mean you will actually get that so at no point you will prove pi equals 2 because that would mean you reached infinity which is impossible in standard numbers

That would make pi equal to 4, as it is compared to the diameter, not the radius

use the infinite series formula, a/1-r, gives the first term pi, common ratio of 1/2, pi/0.5 is equal to 2pi.

If you stretch out the bumps, you will add 1.141592653859.

ᴘɪ ᴍᴇᴀɴs 3.5

here’s math with ^
2^1=2
2^2=4
2^3=8
2^4=16
2^5=32
2^6=64
2^7=128
2^8=256
2^9=512
2^10=1,024
check in replies for more

They never flatten out actually. They just slowly get smaller, than anything we have to measure things. Still 2D space, still 2D figure, just in smaller pieces.